MUHAMMAD ASIF versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Explosives Act (VI of 1908), Sections 4, 5 and 7 bail, the grant of further investigation from the accused was detained for the last one year and ten months, but not charged. was done. According to the FIR, against the accused, at the time of his arrest, he had recovered three hand grenades, three bookworm explosives and two TT pistols, while in the challan presented before the trial court, no Reference was not exposed. Regarding the recovery of three hand grenades and two TT pistols, nor the name of the explosive is listed in the prosecution's testimony, which is required / approved by the Provincial Government under section 7 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908. Consent also lacks such a consensus. In the case of prosecution, further investigation was made on the accused, in which case bail was granted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Mian Walli lawyer