Find a Lawyer

NAVEED-UL-HASSAN versus STATE

Sections 435, 439 and 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324 and 427 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7B Convention E Martyrs (10 of 1984), Article 43 revised by application for review The order was placed against the order. The Anti-Terrorism Court granted permission for the prosecution and re-examination of the objections of the two judicial magistrates, stating that the application has been dismissed so far or that two magistrates were summoned for evidence, one of the two magistrates. , Which recorded a confessional statement. Before deciding whether to record a conviction by a trial court, further processing and recording of statements by other judicial magistrates will prejudice the right to confess to the evidence involved in the case. The decision should be decided by the trial court when the objection was raised which was not done. If the question of admitting the evidence comes to the conclusion that such evidence is admissible, then the evidence of the witness can be filed and if the opinion is established that the evidence is not admissible, then the record of the earlier recorded magistrate. The evidence will be excluded. However, after the trial, the decision was left to the trial court that after the trial, the case was referred to the trial court so that the matter could be considered before the further proceedings on the case, to admit the evidence available on record. To be done Application was allowed accordingly best advocate from Jehangira lawyer