Find a Lawyer

PRESIDENT, ALLIED BANK LTD. versus SHAUKAT NASEEM

Article 3 (3) Civil Service Lack of Jurisdiction of Labor Court Respondents for Termination of Employment, Bank Employee was dismissed and directed to finalize his final liabilities by the Bank's Regional Office. Made - Regular first appeal by respondent rejected for non-availability of territorial jurisdiction was heard by the High Court in a unanimous decision, for the parties to appear before the Labor Court on "B \". With the instruction, the applicant bank held that at the time of dismissal the respondent was within the jurisdiction of the Labor Court at the place of dismissal. Posted at the location `M \, at the Labor Court place` B respondent lacks territorial jurisdiction to disperse the respondent's complaint request and decide the matter in which the respondent was posted to the Regional Office. The subordinate was - B \ at the place which falls under the jurisdiction of the Labor Court \ B \ the respondent was also directed to make his final dues through the Regional Office of Bank at the place `B through, where One of the reasons for the action was born by the High Court; under the circumstances, it was permissible to keep the Labor Court in place. B the regional decision necessary to decide the matter. I have no power, not to discrimination. The victim was dismissed for any legal weakness to warrant interference by the Supreme Court case that he was not eligible for leave to appeal. \ r \ n \ r \ n immigration advocates email from Hyderabad lawyer