Find a Lawyer

SIKANDAR versus STATE

In section 302 (b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), the re-examination of the testimony of section 154, as the facts stated in the statement of the complainant and the FIR, confirmed that the deceased and the accused were the closest. He belonged and did not hate the accused, while on the occasion witnesses were present without any evidence. The eyewitness testimony is convincing enough to maintain the death penalty of the death of only one accused, as evidenced by the direct evidence of the majority of natural and independent witnesses, the absence of any medical evidence The result was that he was charged with the crime. Under the circumstances, the conviction was upheld registration advocate from Talagang lawyer