Find a Lawyer

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.189 OF 2006, DECIDED ON 28TH APRIL, 2006. versus CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.189 OF 2006, DECIDED ON 28TH APRIL, 2006.

Sections 10 and 12 (b) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), sections 454/380 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 10 (2) and 184 (3) by the Supreme Court on the arrest of three minor boys by the police. Jurisdiction Authorities tied the boy's legs to the bandages on the TV show, police showed no suspicion in the papers about a boy escaping from custody. The 6-year-old boy was arrested for two days by police. Was in custody and his detention was illegal and he was a minor. Accordingly, the Judicial Magistrate sent the third boy to jail knowing of his age through a brief order, while in another detailed order his arrest was attempted to be handed over to his relatives. Of the two orders, an order was later issued by the Judicial Magistrate to protect his skin, which the Judicial Magistrate had exceeded his jurisdiction because he should not have sent the boy to a judicial lockup, seeing that the police He was kept in the police station without any justification. For the duty magistrate was present, the judicial magistrate did not have the option of sending the boy to police or closing the court in the investigative phase; if the relatives of the boys were not coming forward, the magistrate could ask the officer for investigation. Or summon the counselor of the area and may have been handed over to him by the Judicial Magistrate who acted illegally, and contrary to the law, the Supreme Court had banned the Judicial Magistrate from exercising judicial powers and the Chief Justice High Court. Of discipline famous high court advocate from Kotla lawyer