Section 497 (2) Immigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Sections 17 and 22 bail, further inquiry FIR grant alleges against the accused in the pretext of sending the accused abroad with other co-accused. Money was received from the complainant. The job, but the data available on the record was completely silent in relation to receiving money by the accused himself. The whole matter was that the money was received by the co-accused and the money was paid to the accused on the question. To what extent can a notoriety be blamed? The commission of the crime, which called for further investigation, made the accused entitled to a bail exception.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
