Find a Lawyer

MUMTAZ ALIAS TAJ versus STATE

Sections 302 (b), 300 and 34 law evidence (10 of 1984), Article 121 Two versions of the evidence were prosecuted, one by the prosecutor and the other by the accused in the sister of the accused persons. The accused was found to be in agreement when the accused fired, did not suffer any injury. The sister of the accused was never presented to the police or before the trial court when the accused's Wanted to bring a case. Wanted to be punished under Section 000000, PPC exemption or Section 2302 (c), PPC, its liability would be the same as that stated under Section 111 of the Law 1hadhad 1984 , But the version of the accused was not credible and the same charge was dropped. Pistol was set on fire with no profession for any rhyme or reason and the victim was hurt. With the recovery of the controversial weapon from the possession of the suspects, the firearm expert was sentenced, in fact, in the circumstances and the accused was not entitled to any kind of relaxation, dismissing his appeal. Was confirmed, his death sentence was confirmed and the murder reference was answered positively divorce advocates from Akhora Khattak lawyer