Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SAFAR versus STATE

Articles 302 and 324 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the accused were sentenced by the trial court for various offenses and sentenced to different time imprisonment and fines, under which the appeal of the trial court's decision. I was separated. Under the controversial order, the High Court had reviewed the evidence in accordance with the principles of the law and the evidence of the prosecution was properly considered as well as the testimony of the defense prosecution. His statements were recorded under Section 161, CR PC, 2/3 days after the incident. And that he too was injured in the same incident happened in front of the accused's house. And the hatchets were used on two occasions. There can be no exception to the search of the evidence obtained by the High Court. The above results did not show any legal flaws, due to a misunderstanding, not to read the evidence or to the wrong structure of the law in the judgment. The petition for leave to appeal against the High Court order was dismissed best advocate from Shangla lawyer