Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RABBANI versus HAJI REHMAT KHAN

The appellant's order in section 8 suit was made impossible under which the trial court's order was set aside and a case was filed for the possession of the respondents, the petitioner claimed that stability. Prior to the operation, he was in possession of the suit land, while the defendant claimed that the dispute had fallen into his shareholding because of the stability order passed by the consolidation officer through the extension officer's impact order. The request submitted was supported, the parties will determine the entitlement; Not found. Undoubtedly in the order of the Stability Officer, the Respondent did not challenge the Consolidation Officer's order before it was the forum for redressal of any complaint arising from the stabilization process, which was settled in accordance with the Order of the Stability Officer. Is. , But the appellant did not say in the dispute below that the appellant in the dispute did not say that the appellant was appealed to the applicant in the dispute and dismissed the respondent's appeal order on the basis of misrepresentation of evidence. , And the order passed by the trial court was restored. famous supreme court advocate from Tibba Sultanpur lawyer