MUHAMMAD YASIN versus STATE
Section 2 30b (b) Appreciating the Evidence Although the eye witnesses are closely related, there was no hostility or intent to make false accusations from the accused in this case. The ocular testimony was consistent and convincing, and was also confirmed by medical evidence. The six-hour delay in filing the FIR was alleged in its statement under section 234 under. The allegations of defamation against Kee's wife were false and she did not deserve any further relaxation. Husbands could not be licensed to kill their wives. Such nasty claims that are neither allowed by law nor acknowledged in any society, and under which the conviction and punishment of the accused were maintained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from FR Bannu lawyer
