TARIQ MAHMOOD versus STATE
Sections 308, 302 (a) and 302 (b) of the testimony of the accused accused of the murder of his wife, the trial court violated the rule of law laid in the state of Mohammad Akram v. 308, PPC was misinterpreted. ), Pursuant to which section 308 PPC shall be attracted only in the case of a Ummah responsible for murder under section 302 (a), PPC and not in the case in which section 302 (b) for Qadil Amad. , Was punished as a punishment under PPC. And 302 (c), the PPC pronounced the verdict unjustifiable by convicting the accused under Case 308, resulting in the separation of the PPC and the case to the trial court for fresh judgment in accordance with law. Shipped.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Mithi lawyer
