Find a Lawyer

KHADIM HUSSAIN versus STATE

Sections 408, 435 and 439 of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 392 and 411, challenged the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge before the Additional Sessions Judge, Mann Tenability Petitioner, on the basis of which he had committed this offense. The appeal filed by the petitioner against his conviction was dismissed. Be filed before the High Court because the sentence imposed on the applicant was more than four years when any sentence and sentence passed by the magistrate could be presented before the court session and if the accused was sentenced by the Assistant Sessions Judge. And when sentenced to more than four years, he was present in the present case in the conviction and sentence of the High Court, after the magistrate passed the first party, an appeal before the sessions court was upheld. The petitioner's appeal was dismissed under the impression that the session session order of the Additional Sessions Judge was not applicable before which the appeal could be made. Dismissed as dismissed, declared illegal and subsequently issued, dismissed as withdrawal of earlier appeal, had no legal effect, both said The orders were rejected while the second was accepted and the appeal, which was dismissed, will be considered pending and the decision will be made on the merit after the hearing parties. patent advocate from Choa Saiden Shah lawyer