Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF ALIAS ASHIQ versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 109, 148 and 149 bail, the FIR was not named in the investigation of the accused in the investigation of the alleged conspiracy before or after the incident. Did not provide witnesses to the alleged conspiracy. The name of the witnesses, the time, place and manner in which the conspiracy was conspired and the names of the accused were not disclosed in the oral statement of the witnesses to the complainant or the late for naming the accused in the FIR. That the defendants hated could not be taken as a fact of the gospel, except for the oral statements of the witnesses, nothing was brought on record to support the allegations of conspiracy during the investigation, in the diary of the case. The deputy superintendent of police (Investigation) denied the witnesses and there was not enough evidence to arrest the conspiracy. The accused was available on record to commit the prime minister, the accused was charged, the case was successful in making the case, further bail could not be stayed as a punishment and the accused could not be jailed indefinitely. Could have been held behind bars for the past 4 1/2 months, the accused was admitted in bail, under conditions us immigration advocates from Kotla Arab Ali Khan lawyer