MST. NUSRAT BANO versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY EDUCATION, LAHORE
Paragraph 11 (iii) General Clause Act (X9 of 1897), Article 21 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Civil Service Locus poenitentiae, Applicant for the recruitment of an additional 10 marks of applicable scope teachers was a resident of the village where the school was located And according to paragraph 11 (iii) of Punjab Recruitment Policy, 2005, she was entitled to 10 additional marks while preparing the merit list, the applicant's complaint was that the authorities had appointed her to the respondent by giving her an additional 10 numbers. , Who was not a resident. The respondent related to the villagers by the respondent was that after the execution of his appointment order, he had acquired valuable rights and his appointment could not be reverted to the principle of locus pensity. The concept of folk punctuality was taken to be a decisive step, but it was not a rule of law that the one-time order was irreversible and if the order was illegal on a past and closed transaction, then Due to such illegal order, no permanent rights could be obtained. The High Court directed the authorities to issue a letter of appointment to the applicant for the relevant post as per the application.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
