Sections 324, 411, 440, 337 A (i), 337 F (ii), 337 F (v) (vi), 148 and 149 indiscriminately receiving stolen property, misconduct, which in turn violated F , Evidence, Evidence, Evidence, Conflict and Riot, Defending the Commonwealth in Support of the Defendant Version in relation to the original supply of suit land, Based on a contract of sale, no documentary evidence was supported. Patwari appeared as a prosecution witness, but the defense party failed to produce any documents relating to the change of possession issued in favor of the defense subsidiary. The defense could not prove that the complaint Nanda party seized possession of the accused Defendant acknowledged that the complainant party was in possession of the suit land At that time and place, the presence of the accused party with tractors and firearms impacted that the contentious land was forcibly illegal. Want to capture the way. After the preparations, the accused party was established in a proposal to share their common purpose for corruption. It was a misdemeanor lawsuit against their commonwealth against being a member of the Legislative Assembly, established under Section 4040 / 148/149, PPC. Comparative analysis of ocular and medical evidence in relation to diagnostic and multiple injuries to the suspects, affected by it, was consistent and consistent with each other without any material contradictions, respecting the defendants in relation to the attributes. Statement Each of them suffered multiple injuries, was not suffering any significant contradiction The accused could not bear the burden of justifying private defense The trial court correctly concluded that
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
