Find a Lawyer

CH. MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus CHAUDHRY MUHAMMAD AFZAL

Section 12 law dismissed Article 117 suit for the specific performance of the contract to sell the evidence (10 of 1984), but the appellate court rejected the same hanging of the plaintiff's professional advocate, which the appellate court dismissed. Treated as a minor witness to the agreement, was the friend of the plaintiff and took notice of the agreement on the trust, it was a serious mistake by the plaintiff that the other marginal witness did not, without justification, present the plaintiff's absence. Who could testify to his payment alone. Considering that, there was a negative argument against him, the plaintiff's illness, if any, was not mentioned in his son's testimony, nor was any request made by the local commission to record the plaintiff's evidence. The plaintiff was sued before the trial to prove that the contract was in place. Executed by the defendants but failed to prove the implementation of the agreement while ignoring the case of the appellate court at the hearing of the plaintiff's question, several aspects of the appeal decision were set aside. And these cases were heard by the High Court in the affidavits of the trial court. tax advocates from Qambar lawyer