Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus MST. RASHIDA BIBI

Section 12 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Articles 113 Convention of Evidence (10 of 1984), Articles 117 and 118 Contract Specific Performance Limitations, Plaintiff / Seller and Plaintiff / Seller Real Sisters Purchase Agreement on House, Seller and With the termination of the lawsuit between her sister, there was no evidence available for the seller to sue the plaintiff and to comply with the contract. The contract was set down for performance specific to the sale of the contract, came in the first part but in the second part of Article 113, the limitation Act went from 1908 and the period to the date when the plaintiff was denied performance. Notice was received, the question of limitation was a question of law and according to the fact, the plaintiff had to prove to him that he had failed to do so, the plaintiff was silent when the plaintiff found out about it. As the sale was over, the defendant stated that the seller refused to file the sale in favor of her just two days before filing a lawsuit. Which proved that the litigation was over and it was unreliable that the third party had seized the property in dispute with the seller and no attempt was made to take possession by the plaintiff since the plaintiff / The seller, the plaintiff / seller and the parties were full sisters in the litigation, lived in the same street, where the disputed property is located, that the plaintiff must follow. It was recently acquainted with the removal of litigation that was not sustainable when the possession of the property by its deserted appellate resulted in the exercise of its jurisdiction, top civil advocates from Burewala lawyer