ABDUL SHAKOOR versus STATE
Section 382B Explosive Material Stances Act (XI of 1908), Section 5 Section 382B, refuses to take advantage of CR PC because it was used for terrorism and was not entitled to benefit from it. The trial was held by the trial court because of the nature of the offense in which the accused was convicted by the trial court, no doubt, he was obliged to consider the time before the sentencing period. Deciding whether to question the defendant's privilege for protection, but using his discretion properly, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case. Hult was not obligated to provide. Its appeal was discretionary in its jurisdiction not to interfere with the trial court's order, which was based on appropriate judicial reasons, under which the relief claims section was benefited. 382B, the CR PC was consequently rejected and accordingly its appeal dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Toru lawyer
