Find a Lawyer

NIAZ ALI versus ABDULLAH KHAN

Articles 6 and 13 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the trial by the trial court, the trial court ruled in this case, but the appellate court rejected the trial court's ruling and ruling. Excluded that the applicant was not able to establish the applicants. That he was the seller's son and stated that the appellate court's address was retained by the High Court, the testimony of the witnesses presented by the applicant and the effect of the non-production of the applicant's sitting table in the case is considered and It was concluded that there was no exception. This question can be drawn to the results of the first Appellate Court, which resulted in the petitioner of the High Court confirming that he failed to make any illegal identification in the appellate court and the High Court's conclusions below. Is. Appeal for leave to appeal in Supreme Court, dismissed and dismissed best advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer