Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM AND OTHERS versus MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ AHMED

Section 302 (b) / 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the trial court upheld the two accused guilty and upheld the conviction of each of them as the High Court of Punishment. , But was sentenced to death. He was convicted by the trial court, sentenced to life imprisonment. Both the complainant and the accused filed a petition for leave to appeal in the Supreme Court against the judgment of the High Court, alleging that the murderer of the deceased had committed the crime through the accused after the retreat. Consideration and planning in the manner, and thus, by the trial court, the accused deserved the death sentence, the accused pleaded that the prosecution had not been able to prove his case beyond any reasonable doubt. , And thus he deserves to be acquitted. The matter of immediate suspicion was reported to the police on the benefit of the doubt. Medical evidence was also strong support akulr versions of hearing the complainant and the witnesses of the prosecution case. Also, after the testimony was appreciated, the High Court, the witnesses of the attendant and the complainant and the prosecution witnesses who were natural witnesses, correctly observed that it was not possible for the witnesses to say exactly which of the accused. Had fired. The accused, who shot the deceased High Court, was sentenced for one reason because at the time of filing his statement under Section 342, CR PC, he was 20/21 years old, about 17/18 years. At the time of the incident, the High Court's use of discretion in minimizing the punishment to the accused was appropriate and justified, even though the crime against them could advocate from Sahiwal lawyer