Find a Lawyer

SIKANDAR KHAN versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL THROUGH L.RS.

Section 42 and Scheme 53 Settlement Scheme No. Suite with the injunction moved to declare that it became the owner of the disputed house under the Settlement Scheme, therefore, in favor of the Department of Health referred to by the respondent The registered sale was illegal. The plaintiff claimed that the plaintiff had nothing. Locus Standi for filing a lawsuit because he had no title to the disputed property suit suit and the decision on appeal was unable to prove that the plaintiff was unable to prove that the suit property was a vacant property and that its cover The plaintiff of Scheme No. VI has done it herself that the suit contains land. An open plot which revealed that there was no application in the settlement scheme number VII; in this case, it was said that neither the raw / pakka vacancies scheme nor the witness to open the plot which was more than thirty years old. Did not appear and the person who disposed that the plaintiff had been occupying the suit property for forty years, was unable to testify to the facts before his birth that the plaintiff in the sale agreement had not been sued. Prior to that his name was to prove the suit in the land so it would appear that he had a challenge to the real estate sale. There was a Lux Standby for NA but if he failed to do so famous lower court advocate from Karak lawyer