Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD EHSAN ULLAH versus STATE

Section 616161 A Prohibition Code (XLV of 1860), Section 295C action was found guilty of the tension of the Superintendent of Police (Investigation). The complainant failed to gather sufficient evidence to establish a case against the accused. The suspect was the victim of an attack and was assassinated by the complainant. The State Counsel did not support the prosecution's case and did not object to the cancellation of the FIR and the continuation of the criminal proceedings after the FIR was registered will create a law and order situation in the High Court, while Section 616161 A, using the powers under the CRPC, the FIR was revoked with further instruction that a criminal case be filed against the complainant under Section 32424, PPC, which sent the accused He was injured in the stomach. property advocates from Dera Bugti lawyer