MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE
The definition of sections 302 (b) and 109 was not designated as an accused in the FIR and even there was no evidence when the incident allegedly took place at 3 pm 30 minutes in the month of January. Came when the winter season was at its peak and the darkness was dark. The sources of light could not be mentioned in the FIR, the prosecutor's witness could not identify the supplementary statement, which had no clear value in the eyes of the law. According to eyewitness accounts, the suspect fired a single shot and this was not the case for the prosecution. Evidence of extra-judicial confession, which was joint, was not admissible in the evidence. No further evidence was available against the accused persons. The trial court was set aside and he was acquitted of the charges against him
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Diamer lawyer
