MUHAMMAD MALIK versus MST. KHURSHID BIBI THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS
The dispute between the Principal and the Attorney following the filing of a Section 42 lawsuit for sale to obtain the facts of the Declaration of Title by the Courts, the effect of the non-payment of the balance consideration amount plaintiff alleges that the General Power of Attorney on whose grounds The sale process has been listed on. The defendant was fraudulently acquitted and it was further alleged that he did not receive any consideration amount. Both courts formally decided the matter in favor of the plaintiff. And gave weight whether the money was paid or not. At the time of the execution of the sale agreement, the sale will be made illegal by the solicitor, either completely or otherwise, once the sale process is proved by a lawyer, partial payment or non-payment of the payment due. , The plaintiff can sue his lawyer to recover the sale process. The power of attorney was not denied but a plea was obtained on the sem lease that no evidence of fraud was presented by the plaintiff and the defendant did not suffer due to any dispute. Had to do, could sue his lawyer for damages between the principal and the attorney principal if it proved that he had acted against the injunction. Or the interests of the important decisions and decrees of the two courts below were set aside and the case dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Sikandarabad lawyer