Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus ZAFAR SAEED

Section 8 High Court (Lahore) Rules, and Orders I, Part M, Chapter 1 Suite Defendants imposed orders along with the following courts, under which to obtain possession of the disputed property through disputed property. The lawsuit was filed, while both the courts were down. The declaration of this case relied on the report prepared by the Tehsildar as the local commission did not comply with the report of the local commission. The terms of Chapter 1 Part M Vol. Rules and Local Commission Orders Report of the High Court (Lahore), for the purpose. For the coordinate dispute the land identification task was taken from a metal road, but no indication was found, the required coordinates were first compiled by the High Court Rules so as to comply with the High Court Rules. Prepare a local commission failure report for , Described his report as useless because a piece of evidence said the report had been set aside. Since the plaintiffs were obliged to prove that the defendants had occupied the land they owned, the plaintiffs were required to present evidence in support of their claim that the decree of the 2-Marl-occupied courts from the disputed land. Was amended in accordance with the 2 Marla which was in the possession of the Defendants, the defendants' case to the limit was dismissed by the courts below, however, the case was retained in connection with the remaining plaintiffs \ r \ n \ r \ n jobs for fresh advocates from Raiwind lawyer