MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus STATE
Sections 17 and 22 of the testimony of the victims / prosecution witnesses denied the methods and methods under which they paid the accused, who promised to take them overseas and make arrangements for employment. Payment was made at the house of the victim during the investigation, the passports of the two victims were never seized, but records show that the documents were in the custody of the accused, who was traveling with the witnesses / victims. Non-submission of documents, no matter what, both victims appear before the trial court It provided a clear and vivid picture of what happened, and the witnesses remained steadfast in their length and scrutiny. There was nothing in the statements of the witnesses / victims, either to doubt their credibility or to say that they were guilty of any misconduct or to complain against the accused against making false accusations, if the witnesses were told. Confidently, it proved to be true that the accused was sufficient to maintain the delay conviction; such a case was very natural in the registration of the case, as people were always interested in their money and for that purpose. So they keep trying and when they finally fail to reach the goal, then they get FIA personnel. When contacted to file a complaint to delay the filing of the ER, it was of no importance that the accused had been facing trial for the past nine years and had suffered enough. He remained under trial. Mills along with the prisoner and the offender in the case
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Jaranwala lawyer