Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD TUFAIL versus ALLAQA JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE


Articles 202, 203 and 204 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of not releasing the process of domestic wives The final findings of the facts by the courts under the complainant alleges that the defendants had quarreled with him. His co-accused Lalkara is on trial. The court issued proceedings against the accused persons and refused to file proceedings against the respondents of domestic wives, the trial court order was upheld by the High Court, which, under the jurisdiction of the three courts, after the testimony of the witnesses, gave evidence. Together they found out that it had no room. Acting against the female respondents, there was no sense that the male members would continue to nurture Lalkar, only the decision of the domestic women to quarrel with the applicant was taken by the High Court in its decision. The idea was to leave the idea of uncertainty appealing was denied

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates contact from Pasroor lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.