Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQ

Section 8 and 42 constitution of Pakistan (1973), declaration of title to Article 185 (3) and the acquisition of possession of the property, the evidence of the facts by the two courts below, the respondent being the owner on the basis of the registered cell deed of 138 1946 Claims to be. , Was executed by the original owner and requested to be recovered for possession of the property of the suit, while the applicant stated that on the basis of the sale agreement dated 10-12 1946, he was the owner, whose son was executed by the original owner. And asked for a declaration in such case. The trial court dismissed the plaintiff's dismissal and the applicant's verdict was ruled that the appellate court rejected the trial court's finding and dismissed the defendant's case, and the applicant's decision was dismissed and approved by the appellate court. The decisions made were upheld by the High Court. The appellate court, along with the facts, filed findings that the applicant failed to show how the son of the original owner, whom he was unanimously claiming to be executed. There is no evidence to sell, the suit was the property owner, as can be presented by the defendant's strong, petitioner, the respondents had fully proven the execution of the sale deed registered by the owner even the son. The owner of the contract to sell the execution was followed by a legal decision approved by the High Court after the registered sale deed decision did not face any legal weakness so as to appeal the intervention by the Supreme Court. Declined online advocate from Lakki Marwat lawyer