Find a Lawyer

FAQIR HUSSAIN versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Re-examination of the evidence The medical evidence supported the ocular account presented by substantially natural and independent witnesses to the extent of the time, the nature and arms of the injured. Was used for Causing injuries to casualties. At the behest of the suspects, a blood-stole theft, which was used as a weapon of crime, was recovered. The motive set forth by the prosecution was proven by the highly credible evidence of the witnesses; witnesses did not intend to accuse any personal scandal, hostility or unknown crime, and they collected it directly. Each material point was confirmed by each other and their testimony was further supported by medical evidence. Participated in situations that were relied upon to maintain dependence and the defendants did not read any false statement or evidence or obtained any legal conclusions in the conclusion drawn by the two courts regarding the guilt of the accused seeking intervention. Or the facts did not indicate weakness. The Supreme Court and there can be no exception, the decision of the High Court request for leave of appeal without any substance, was dismissed under the circumstances. list of supreme court advocates from Parachinar lawyer