Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ AND 2 OTHERS versus STATE

Section 9 (c) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) sentencing, reduction of three accused involved in the crime, dispute on the records of one male and two female accused has shown that the opium and hashish allegedly. The suspect was seized in the form of slabs that were not more than one kilogram; samples of marijuana and opium produced by the Chemical Examiner, receiving only one kilogram of marijuana and one kilo opium from each female suspect. And according to the report, according to the Chemical Examiner, two kilograms of drugs would be recovered from the possession of each female suspect, so the sentence for life imprisonment was excessive Dee shows that the trial court as well as the High Court, without taking any notice of it, failed to determine the amount of defect in the prosecution case, based on allegations of drug possession of more than 10kg from each female accused. Moving forward, the three accused were sentenced to life imprisonment, believed to carry around 23kg of drugs, while a detailed analysis of the evidence suggests that only 4kg The hashish and the opium proved to be the same. Drugs and, moreover, female offenders were taking drugs with them, on the indication of a male suspect who was with the accomplices the Supreme Court's main beneficiary, considering that two kilograms of recovered chars and opium The amount of marijuana and two kilos of opium was proved as drugs; the accused under Section 9 (c) were retained, fined, but reduced their punishment based on the circumstances of the case. Gone. Application for leave of appeal for appeal turned into appeal when you need a advocate from Hangu lawyer