Find a Lawyer

ZUBAIR AHMAD versus STATE

Section 2 (2 (b) / 34 34) Although the accused was nominated by the complainant along with six other persons in the FIR, it was found to be of no particular character. The witnesses pleaded innocence to the accused; two of the prosecution's witnesses were related. A large number of people were involved in the case, but during the investigation of the case, the matter was not really reported. Was granted, the prosecution's witnesses gave clean chit to all those who belonged to their community or caste, but were only acquitted against Such testimony of the prosecution witnesses could not be relied upon by him, especially in a case that involved the execution of a 222 bore rifle, after more than three years. No results, especially since it was never sent. The forensic science laboratory was recovered from the open space to compete, the result of a retrieval rifle in the absence of a forensic science lab report. It was not revealed that Cross's investigation had impacted that Mutofi had enmity with others, but the prosecution did not. And why did the accused took part in the event, only being a fugitive from the law the accused was not enough to sustain the punishment of prosecution. Failure to bring home charges against the accused, the impugned order passed by the trial court was set aside and the accused acquitted online advocate from Chicha watni lawyer