Find a Lawyer

WARYAM versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR DISTRICT, FAISALABAD

Section 24 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Further Increase the Food Scheme Failure to meet the conditions of land restoration, unanimous facts must be approved by the following courts for evidence That the allotment of land was denied to the plaintiff on this basis. The plaintiff seized the order of the authorities before the court, but his case and appeal were simultaneously rejected by the trial court and by the plaintiff the Looty Appeal Court had submitted that the section of the Government Land Colonization (Punjab) Act. No notice was taken under 24. , 1912, was issued to support the Revenue Authority's report. The collector's accuracy order was implemented only on the basis of a report submitted by the Assistant Commissioner. The report does not indicate that the plaintiff was affiliated with or was investigating during the investigation. The District Collector was provided with grounds for issuing notice to the plaintiff under section 24 of the Colonization of Gov. rnment Lands (Punjab) Act, 1912, after which the plaintiff has the right to attack the information contained in the report. Such a process was not implemented, so the assessee's prejudice to the Assistant Commissioner was based on inaccurate reporting by the field staff, and the plaintiff's costs were not. The opportunity to reject such a report and prove that it is not in violation of any of the terms of the lease even if the claimant did not meet the terms of the lease, the restoration of the land is not an automatic result of this interval. The defendant should have been given time to rectify any infringement. Under the provisions of section 24 of the Government Lands (Punjab) Colonization Act, 1912 jobs for advocates from More kunda lawyer