NORAIZ-UL-HAQ versus DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, PAKPATTAN SHARIF
R (65 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petitioner) The applicants and the respondents were candidates in the election, in which the applicants of the contest were declared looted by the competent authority. It was filed that his request to the Returning Officer for recalculation, without presenting the evidence of the parties and recording the evidence of the parties, was disputed in the Election Tribunal, affirming the respondents for the order to re-count. No specific allegation was made by the prosecutor without any record of the evidence And no material was available on record to support a competitor. Before the official results were launched, the Returning Officer had filed a petition with the counting of votes, the Election Tribunal had not taken Passed through the file and took notice of the facts in the face of the record, taking legal action and passing the invalid order. The re-enumeration order was, therefore, assigned to a by-law from the by-election tribunal. After taking action, the matter was asked to decide
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
