Find a Lawyer

MST. GHULAM FATIMA versus SAMI ULLAH

Section 25 Special Relief Act (1 of 1877), Section 42 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 91 and 144 suits for sale limitation of declarations by the deceased in favor of his sons / defendants. The daughters / defendants challenged the declaration case. Saying that the deceased did not make any sale but the suit was issued but the order was set aside in the appeal, the record of the hearing of the justification could not be verified as the defendant admitted the minor at the time of the alleged sale. They did not show any source of income for themselves or their mother who provided them with a consideration amount was not sufficient to prove the alleged sale because the mutation was merely an end There was only one record to be made and he did not create the title by himself that was to be presented to the lumberman. The accused was identified before the Revenue Officer and Patidar, who was allegedly listed in the order of presence at the time of the change, but the Revenue Officer, however, did not present them without any justification and thus could not be proved. That the seller allegedly became aware of a controversial change only after his father's death, after which he failed in his advertising suit, therefore, over time solicitors from Sambrial lawyer