The suit was dismissed for the specific performance of the section 12 suit sale agreement, but the question of the fact that the appeal was granted was read after the plaintiff's statement in continuation of the convictions one after the other, arguing that the defendant's condition At the time of the adjournment, such minor contradictions physically claimed by the witnesses did not materially affect the outcome of the case but did not result in any type of investigation. But they were never exempted by the party, nor can it be reformed. The appellate court found that since the transaction had already been completed and finalized by the seller in favor of the seller / Modi, the seller had no title to transfer to a third party, Was based on a pure question of fact, which did not call for the intervention of the High Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
