MST. TASNIM AKHTAR versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
R7 Customs Act (IV of 1969), Section 168, 194 A & 196 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application was denied under the Personal Goods Scheme to clear the imports of the vehicle from being two years old. Appellate Tribunal Maintenance Issue Before the Appellate Tribunal Maintenance Issue, a constitutional application was filed by the importer during the hearing of the appeal such as in any law for the year of manufacture of the vehicle or in relation to the interpretation of the constitution or earlier law. Cannot be modified to other legal provisions for forming questions. Prior to the tribunal being a court importer, the tribunal could have referred to the High Court under section 196 of the Customs Act, 1969, against the order of the tribunal which raised the question of law. Did not challenge a specific order. What was cited in the constitutional petition resulted in no action against the goddess of importers' interest in obtaining income from her original position by raising additional defenses in relation to the year of manufacture, the constitutional jurisdiction Can't justify the implementation, such interference by the High Court will not only mean the termination of the tribunal's decision, but will prevent the appeal. Under the Customs Act, 1969, the High Court as well as the Supreme Court Importer can put their arguments before the Tribunal as well as the law and the High Court dismisses the constitutional petition within the limits. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Gari Mori lawyer