Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus STATE

Section 2? (b) and 34 34 were the number of allegations defining evidence, while the prosecution's witnesses were four in number at the time of the incident, but none of the prosecution's witnesses attempted to rescue the victim. Were relatives or suffered any damage. Medical evidence as well as other circumstances showed that prosecution witnesses were not present at the time of the incident. The motive was linked to the deceased and the accused on the basis of gestures, but the recovery of the weapon had no benefit. The pistols were not sealed. One of the people was involved in the recovery process and there was no recovered from the incident. The recovered pistols were not sent to the forensic science laboratory and can not be said. Whether he was in the same position or the caliber of the pistol was not mentioned in the FIR, suspicion was being met in all matters of the prosecution, the benefit of the doubt extended to the accused and he was charged. Was excluded from the decision and the decision passed by him. Trial court when you need a advocate from Ukba lawyer