FAROOQ NADIM versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION
The deletion of Article 199 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 420, 468 and 471 constitutional application F1R, the contents of the FIR indicate that the complainant / respondent gave a loan of Rs. And it received payment of Rs. 82,000 and the applicant / accused executed a promissory note in favor of the complainant for receiving payment of Rs. 7,18,000 between the parties. Was civil in nature, and no material or facts were allegedly involved in the FIR. The FIR applicants did not offer any kind of dishonesty to the complainant and as a result it was not imposed that the applicants had forged any document in which any of the facts set forth in the FIR Information was not disclosed which constituted an FIR of an identifiable offense. The violation of the law was registered in the complaint.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Mustang lawyer