KAMAL DIN versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF
The oral court's appeal for breach of the suit agreement to recover the arrears of section 10 affirmed that the trial court's question passed whether the parties had made an oral agreement to sell or whether the defendants had, on a date, No mention of time and place was proved by the evidence of the sale agreement to the plaintiff, nor was there any recovery of Rs 15,000 (record amount) available on record. Went to the root of the case for The decisions and orders of the courts below were contrary to the evidence on record and were barred by illegal proceedings / irregularities and were set aside by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer
