Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus MST. SALLAN MAI

Para 24 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 39 Special Relief Act (of 1877), Section 12 Agricultural Land, the sale suit for specific performance was rejected because the contract was established on record, order During the execution of the suit, the sale agreement was executed by the court in favor of the plaintiff and, according to the registered rights of the plaintiffs' sons, after the sale of the suit land, only one canal of land was left. Due to the low daily rate, this change was termed Land Reform Regulations, 1972 Revenue Officer by Land Reform The provisions of the 1972 Act were not intended to be used for the unlawful benefit of dishonest individuals who, in the jurisdiction of the plaintiff, declared any transaction in violation of the provisions of the Land Reform Regulations 1973 explicitly. Entrusted to the Company. The officer could not go to this aspect of the Ampegan case, including the civil courts and his organizational party, except that the ad orders passed by the Revenue Officers who had canceled the amendment were without jurisdiction, in harmony with the courts below. No material irregularities were found, which did not demand any interference by the High Court in the review jurisdiction. family advocate from Pak Pattan Sharif lawyer