RAHAT AFZA versus BAO MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE ALIAS BABA GOGI SAIN
Section 8 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), suit AXXI, Rr 35 and 36, claimed the plaintiff to be in a controversial plot on the basis of registered registered deed while the plaintiff made the same title on the basis of oral gift. Claimed. The original sale of the suit was made by the original owner before the execution of the suit but the order in the appeal was put aside The alleged oral gift of the property has been used for religious purposes for many years, evidence. Accordingly, the plaintiff presented an appropriate procedure for the registered sale deed and four witnesses to prove that it included a witness to the sale process, while the plaintiff failed to prove the facts of the oral gift while the defendant There was no cogent content on record to support the version of, so change or alteration suit property, if any. However, the illegal occupation of the suit for a long time did not remove the plaintiff's title from the utility. The defendant has a legally registered sale agreement, despite the fact that the underlying plot is being used for religious purposes, altering the purpose for which the disputed plot can be used by the claimant, in the possession of the plaintiff. Will not come back
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
