Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MAJEED versus MST. MAJEEDAN BIBI

Section 135 and 172 (2) (XIX) Distribution of the State Bar on the jurisdiction of the Civil Court under the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Section 172, West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, After the Assistant Collector ordered the division, the order of Saeed by the plaintiff claimed that he did not get a chance to hear and examine the respondents during the distribution proceedings: in front of the District Collector. An appeal was filed, reviewed before the Commissioner and the Member Board of Revenue, but all these officials found that the plaintiff had no case to accept the case. To declare that the division proceedings were unlawful and that it was rejected by the courts legally illegal, it cannot be assumed that all the revenue authorities and the courts were aware of the facts of the case. Was not compatible. Applicant was provided with appropriate opportunity of hearing, so petitioner requested that he was not given proper opportunity of hearing. Revenue forums would not be accepted, nor would civil court have to take care of the value of land. The confession that during the division proceedings he was not given the right to cross the defendant because he was genuinely terminated because it was said that prejudice was identified because of instability. The outpatient action was initiated by the Revenue Officers, a competent forum within the exclusive jurisdiction that granted the exclusive jurisdiction to the Revenue Authorities under Section 172 (2) (XIX) of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967. Unless intervened by the civil court advocates from Ahmadpur East lawyer