MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus MAULVI NAZIR AHMAD THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS
Section 13 suit pre-contempt suit was ordered but the order was dismissed in the first appeal Failure to prove the plaintiff's student status as a day, date, month and year as the plaintiff lost the necessary details of the plea deal. had been. Similar cases were given to the plaintiff if this was proved only by the evidence, but the necessary details were not given or proved by the witnesses, even the notice of the students was not proved. And one of the two witnesses was not presented by the plaintiffs, and such error was not explained by the defendants' assertion that the decision of the appeal should have been in accordance with the opinion of the referee, in order to prove the alleged agreement. Nothing was on the record by which the parties appointed the referee. In the absence of anything illegal, the outcome of the appeal cannot be interfered with by the High Court in the second appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
