HAFIZ MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus DEPUTY DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), TEHSIL BAHAWALPUR
Section 13 Registration Act (XVI of 1908), Section 17 (2) (6) Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XX, R 14 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Pre-discrimination of constitutional application The request to add the revenue to the record on the agreed settlement was rejected by the Revenue Officer for rejecting the order, so the pre-emption decree that did not produce any fresh sale transaction Or did not give birth to a new stranger No need to register, pre-emptor under OX, received from the date of submission of CPC R14 and was not required for the registered document In passing the title of ex-empire under section 17 (2) (6) of the N Act, 1908, the pre-emptive decree was exempted from registration, therefore, an improper order under which not to register Impeachment decree denied implementation of Ion was declared illegal and illegal on the highway and others v. Member, Board of Revenue, Punjab and others 2004 SCMR 117; Rain Lal v Harpal and another Air 1929 all 237; Baji Rao Social Swords v. Abdul Ghafar Vlad Sheikh Rehman AIR 1949 Nag 338 Ref.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
