Find a Lawyer

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB FOOD DEPARTMENT, LAHORE versus JAVED IQBAL AND OTHERS

Section 3 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Sections 4 and 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) isc Misconduct / Principal reduction in penal service tribunals in the amount of punishment, accusation of jurisdiction of public servants Dismissed from employment under negligence and negligence, but the service tribunal reduced the penalty to reduced pay scales. Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000 In removing the Punjab from the word `corrupt 'the definition of Val was almost the same as that assigned to the Punjab Civil. In the Servant (Discipline and Discipline) Rules, 1999, accusations of corruption or corruption were always regarded as more important than allegations of disqualification. Authorized authority to punish a public servant for any of the punishments mentioned in the law. Jurisdiction but for a secure purpose. The administration of justice should be punished according to the severity of the offense, otherwise the law dealing with this article will lose its usefulness. Government servants were not guilty of misconduct or corruption, therefore, ineligible or negligent. The maximum sentence for dismissal of the charge was properly reduced by the Criminal Tribunal. The Supreme Court refuses to interfere in the leave of appeal by the service tribunal regarding the punishment imposed on the government employees by the competent authority. Ms Yasmin Sehgal, Assistant AG (Punjab) and Mian Ghulam Hussain, Applicants Advocate for the Supreme Court (in all cases), Abdul Waheed Chaudhry, Advocate Supreme Court and Chaudhry Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate on Record for Response (2003 in C PS Nos 2558 L and 2598 L to 2600 L) top advocates from Khangarh lawyer