Find a Lawyer

ZAKI MUHAMMAD versus QUDRAT SHER

Sections 12 and 42 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Constitutional Jurisdiction declare that the High Court observed the petitioner was apprehended by the petitioners and the High Court while rejecting the constitutional petition stating that the sale There should be a lawsuit for the specific performance of the contract. The High Court added that the deal was interpreted as shameful and the sale was also considered. Applicants believed that they were ready to request civil court jurisdiction to resolve their grievances, but they would be affected by the High Court's observation in the decision. The plaintiffs on the merit want the Supreme Court to observe that the court before which the verdict will be rendered should be allowed to stand free without being affected by the observations made by the High Court if the proceedings were followed in this decision. Will be implemented. The High Court before the Civil Court, such observations should not affect the outcome of the case in any way. The leave of appeal was disposed of according to Shaukat Ali Maher, Advocate Supreme Court and Chaudhry Mehdi Khan Mehtab, the petitioners. Advocate on record for (in all requests) Mohammed Tahir, Special Counsel for Respondents (in all requests) Fayaz Baig, Settlement Clerk, Board of Revenue Office, Dera Ghazi Khan (CP No. 2940L / 2000) registration advocate from Warburton lawyer