Find a Lawyer

MUNIR HUSSAIN SHAH versus SECRETARY, PROVINCIAL ASSEMBLY, PUNJAB LAHORE

Article 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Applicability of disclaimer of service The rule of permanent enforcement was dismissed in the light of the third inquiry, which was dismissed by the public servant and by the government employees in the appeal filed against this order. The service tribunal offered was retained. In the other two similar cases, the service tribunal referred the cases to the department for a de novo inquiry but their appeal was dismissed by the service tribunal's confirmation. Each case has its own facts and circumstances, and its merits have to be decided by or through the service tribunal. The principle of consistency of the Supreme Court can be formulated only if there are similar facts and circumstances. The allegations against the other employees were two different from those whose cases were presented for the de novo inquiry, because this principle of consistency was not attracted by the Inquiry Officer's allegations against the civil servant and the inquiry. Recommended about the recommendations put forth by me. The competent authority service tribunal accepted the exercise of its powers under section 5 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974, the same government employee refused to intervene. Any question about the law of interference of public importance by the Public Supreme Court. Failed to lift patent advocate from Poonch lawyer