Find a Lawyer

RASHEED AHMAD versus NASAR DIN

Section 13 (3) Conan Shavulat (10 of 1984), a 3-suit suit for pre-testimony after the trial, was upheld by the appellate court and the appellate court upheld whether the plaintiff had retained. What were the students and the indicators? According to the law, the legitimate plaintiff stated that he had sent the notice to the student Eshaad only a month and a half after the sale information stating that the statement was not true as the plaintiff's lawyer was a witness in the case. He had no power. Reading contradictory testimony itself, the plaintiff presented it as untrustworthy witness, then the notice of counsel was not given within the stipulated time as per law but this fact has been avoided by the court-ordered notices, illegal decisions and rulings. Were not legally sustainable which Hai separated. Court \ r \ n \ r \ n best advocate from Chitral lawyer