Find a Lawyer

TAHIR versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 34 bail, the FJR grant itself alleges that the murder was unpleasant, the name of the co-accused was not found in the FIR in any capacity, But then came the first scene. About a month and a half after the filing of the FIR through the supplemental statement given by the complainant, the accused was one of the two unidentified persons listed in the FIR who escaped from the scene with the named accused. had gone. Two of the prosecution's witnesses, / tad, recorded their statements under Section 161, CR PC, claiming that they had already taken the accused and other persons into his mind, even There was no specific role in these statements and the allegations leveled against him. Riding on common and collective terms, a rope was reportedly reported on the suspect and his co-accused during the investigation, but I was convinced that such recovery was a joint recovery and at a substantial cost. It was suspected that there was nothing available on the record to link the juicy ops recovered from the alleged murder; there was no other direct or indirect evidence on the record so that the accused challan was already submitted after completion of the investigation. Continuing the detention of the accused in the jail was not likely to predict any favorable motive, against the accused. C to demand further investigation into the offense under sub-section (2), was admitted to bail, conditions immigration advocates email from Ratto Dero lawyer