Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 409, 420, 468, 471, 109 and 161 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2). Falsifying property for fraudulent purposes, for the purpose of fraud, forgery, using fake documents as a forged document, civil servant, prosecution of anyone other than legal compensation in relation to public works, criminal misconduct, bail The sanction of the sentence was that he was wrongly involved. In the present case with ancient purposes. The accused's name was not in the FLR and he was involved in the present case on inquiry. That the crime report did not mention the exact date and time of the alleged incident. The suspect remained on physical remand for a long time but did not recover anything. The evidence against the accused was in the form of documents which were in the possession of the prosecution and thus there was no possibility of tampering. That the accused was a civil servant and was not likely to be a fugitive, and that the accused was a former offender and was not required by the police for further investigation, the accused's name was not listed in the FIR and the accused There was no specific date and time. The incident was mentioned in which the accused remained on physical remand for a long time but nothing was recovered from it, it was recovered before it which did not come under the prohibited clause of section 497 (1) against the accused. Yes, there was PC evidence against the accused. Format of documents which were in the exclusive possession of the prosecution and there was no fear of tampering if the accused was released on bail, the accused public servant
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
